Skip to content

What Does Project 2025 Say?

Share this page:

On November 5, 2024, the United States Elected Donald J. Trump to a second term. The day after that, his allies gleefully admitted that Project 2025 was their – and his – agenda the entire time.

This is what we’re up against.

“Yet for the past 34 years, the U.S. civil service has been unable to distinguish consistently between strong and unqualified applicants for employment.”
Citation: Project 2025, Section 1.3: Central Personnel Agencies: Managing the Bureaucracy, Donald Devine, Dennis Dean Kirk, and Paul Dans, pages 103, paragraph 2
Context:

That’s an interesting claim. I’m not saying that every government employee is “strong”, but to suggest that nobody who is currently in a position to hire government workers can tell the difference between “strong” and “unqualified” is fairly ludicrous. There’s a broad chasm between “strong” and “unqualified”, and it’s rather easy to tell the difference, even as I suspect that they’re about to argue that the government hiring managers are somehow bureaucratically handicapped from “knowing” this information.

Full contextual analysis of Section 1.3: Central Personnel Agencies: The Bureaucracy here.