Skip to content

What Does Project 2025 Say?

Share this page:

On November 5, 2024, the United States Elected Donald J. Trump to a second term. The day after that, his allies gleefully admitted that Project 2025 was their – and his – agenda the entire time.

This is what we’re up against.

“It [the Biden administration] has dispensed with decades of bipartisan consensus on foreign aid and pursued policies that contravene basic American values and have antagonized our partners in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It has decoupled U.S. assistance from free-market reforms that are the keystone of economic and political stability and has teamed with global institutions to impose central planning diktats on an unprecedented scale. Wasteful budget increases requested by the Administration and appropriated by Congress have outstripped USAID’s capacity to spend funds responsibly, and U.S. foreign aid has been transformed into a massive and open-ended global entitlement program captured by—and enriching—the progressive Left.”
Citation: Project 2025, Section 2.6: Agency for International Development, Max Primorac, page 286, paragraph 3
Context:

This is more highly partisan/exaggerated framing. The Biden Administration has shifted foreign aid priorities, but whether it has “dispensed with bipartisan consensus” is debatable. U.S. foreign aid has traditionally focused on issues like democracy promotion, economic development, and humanitarian assistance. While the Biden Administration has emphasized climate change, gender equality, and racial justice more than previous administrations, these are not entirely new focuses. Critics argue that these shifts break from bipartisan norms, but much of the core of U.S. aid policy – such as disaster relief and development – remains consistent.

The phrase “basic American values” is vague and subjective. Supporters of Biden’s policies might argue that promoting climate action, gender equality, and inclusivity align perfectly with modern American values, particularly in addressing global challenges. Conservative critics may see these priorities as diverging from traditional foreign aid goals like economic development or anti-communism.

Full contextual analysis of Section 2.6: Agency for International Development here.