Skip to content

What Does Project 2025 Say?

Share this page:

On November 5, 2024, the United States Elected Donald J. Trump to a second term. The day after that, his allies gleefully admitted that Project 2025 was their – and his – agenda the entire time.

This is what we’re up against.

“Eliminate carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) programs. Despite the recent expansion of the 45Q tax credit for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) to $87 per ton, most carbon capture technology remains economically unviable, although private-sector innovations are on the horizon.”
Citation: Project 2025, Section 3.2: Department of Energy and Related Commissions, Bernard L. McNamee, page 408, paragraph 5
Context:

Is CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage) really “economically unviable”? No, that’s an oversimplification. Right now, it’s true that the cost of capturing, transporting, and storing CO2 is relatively high, at around $40-$100 per ton. Adding to the cost and complexity is that we (currently) lack the infrastructure to support it on a huge scale. Building out the infrastructure would require significant investment. The investment doesn’t always come from private sectors, because the upfront costs of installing CCUS systems are high, especially where profit margins are already tight or regulatory pressure is insufficient to force investment in carbon mitigation.

The U.S. government has introduced incentives like the 45Q tax credit McNamee mentions above, which provides up to $87 per ton of CO2 captured and stored, to make CCUS more economically viable. This tax credit helps reduce the cost gap between current CCUS technologies and other carbon mitigation strategies. McNamee is proposing ending this.

Full contextual analysis of Section 3.3: Department of Energy and Related Commissions here.