“One example includes potentially seeking the overruling of Humphrey’s Executor v. United States. This case approved so-called independent agencies whose directors are not removable by the President at will.”
Citation: Project 2025, Section 3.8: Department of Justice, Gene Hamilton, page 592, paragraph 2
Context:
In short, it was about limiting the power of the President (also known as “checks and balances.”) Overturning this would enable the President to more easily fire people his disagrees with personally, even if that was their only offense. More details in the analysis below.
Full contextual analysis of Section 3.8: Department of Justice here.
Section: Section 3.8: Department of Justice