Skip to content

What Does Project 2025 Say?

Share this page:

On November 5, 2024, the United States Elected Donald J. Trump to a second term. The day after that, his allies gleefully admitted that Project 2025 was their – and his – agenda the entire time.

This is what we’re up against.

“The department has consistently threatened that any conduct not aligning with the liberal agenda “could” violate federal law—without actually taking a position that the conduct in question is illegal—using the prospect of protracted litigation and federal sanctions to chill disfavored behavior such as with state efforts to restrict abortion or prevent genital mutilation of children.”
Citation: Project 2025, Section 3.8: Department of Justice, Gene Hamilton, page 578, paragraph 7
Context:

Note that he provides zero examples of the DOJ threatening to prosecute people for crimes for not “aligning with the liberal agenda.”

The phrase “genital mutilation of children” is particularly inflammatory and misleading. It refers to gender-affirming surgeries, but using this term intentionally evokes a sense of horror and human rights violations, conflating a medical and ethical debate about transgender healthcare with the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM), a widely condemned cultural practice. The language here is designed to provoke outrage rather than engage in a good faith debate about gender-affirming care.

This statement is intended to fearmonger, inflame, and create further cultural division. Are trans children undergoing genital surgeries? No. Gender-affirming care can start as early as age 11, and can be things like allowing the child to dress as they want, and be called the names they want. Sometimes it means reversible hormone therapy. Surgery is held off until the trans child is legally an adult20, with extremely limited exceptions.

“The general recommendation is for gender affirming surgeries to be done after age 18 with limited exceptions,” Dr. Michael Irwig, director of transgender medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, wrote in an email. “The patient should always be of an age where they have adequate maturity including the ability to understand the potential risks and benefits of any treatment.” [Source]21

In short, nobody is out there “mutilating childrens’ genitals”, unless you count circumcision.

Full contextual analysis of Section 3.8: Department of Justice here.