More lies and exaggerations. The incident he’s referring to of people ‘parading’ outside conservative Supreme Court Justice’s homes were peaceful legal protestors and picketers, being monitored by U.S. Marshals who didn’t hurt anyone while exercising their First Amendment rights.

“The relatively orderly scene, with no sign of any local police presence, stands in stark contrast to the portrait painted by Republicans and conservative activists.”

So, it’s perfectly clear why the DOJ didn’t pursue charges against any of these protestors: What they were doing wasn’t illegal. Nicholas Roske, the man who was arrested near Kavanaugh’s home while in possession of a handgun (AND WHO TURNED HIMSELF IN AND SURRENDERED), did have attempted murder charges levied against him.

Hamilton arguing that the FBI should “protect the Constitution” while at the same time prosecuting legal protestors is insanity. I couldn’t find an example of “violent attacks on pregnancy care centers”, i.e., people protesting at pro-life clinics and getting violent, without facing prosecution. Here’s a case where three protestors graffitied threats on a pro-life clinic, and all three pleaded guilty, indicating that they were indeed prosecuted. They did not commit physical violence (although the threat of violence is still violence under the law.)

In this article by the Guardian, they detail some instances of this type of thing occurring, but note that nobody has been injured (which is not to downplay the seriousness – sometimes arson has been involved). But again, there’s no evidence that the DOJ has failed to prosecute these events equally.

Full contextual analysis of Section 3.8: Department of Justice here.