Skip to content

What Does Project 2025 Say?

Share this page:

On November 5, 2024, the United States Elected Donald J. Trump to a second term. The day after that, his allies gleefully admitted that Project 2025 was their – and his – agenda the entire time.

This is what we’re up against.

Topic: Human Trafficking

“Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. If an alien who was a trafficking or crime victim is actively and significantly cooperating with law enforcement as a witness, the S visa is already available and should be used. Pending elimination of the T and U visas, the Secretary should significantly restrict eligibility for each visa to prevent fraud.”

Citation: Project 2025, Section 2.2: Department of Homeland Security, Ken Cuccinelli, page 173, paragraph 4
Context:

The elimination of T and U visas would be a huge and deliberate step back in the U.S.’s commitment to protecting human rights, particularly the rights of trafficking victims and crime victims.

Full contextual analysis of Section 2.2: Department of Homeland Security here.

Share this quote from Project 2025:

“Congress should repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, and FinCEN should withdraw its poorly written and overbroad beneficial ownership reporting rule.”

Citation: Project 2025, Section 4.2: Department of the Treasury, William L. Walton, Stephen Moore, and David R. Burton, page 739, paragraph 9
Context:

This one is transparently (if you’ll excuse the pun) evil. The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), passed in 2021, requires U.S. companies to disclose their beneficial ownership information – that is, the individuals who own or control them – to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The goal of the law is to combat money laundering, tax evasion, and illicit financial activities by increasing transparency regarding company ownership structures. The CTA mainly targets shell companies used to hide illicit financial dealings.

The CTA is also seen as an essential tool for disrupting networks involved in human trafficking, narcotics, and terrorism financing​.

So if we reduce oversight of this, what’s going to happen? Increased financial and other crimes, and decreased law enforcement visibility into it and capability of prosecuting it – with no visibility, it’s a LOT harder to prove the law was broken.

Full contextual analysis of Section 4.2: Department of the Treasury here.

Share this quote from Project 2025: